home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: ix.netcom.com!netnews
- From: aahenry@ix.netcom.com (Aurora Henry)
- Newsgroups: comp.lang.c++
- Subject: Re: BC++ 5.0 and MFC?
- Date: 18 Feb 1996 04:25:33 GMT
- Organization: Very Little
- Message-ID: <4g69nt$sfs@cloner2.ix.netcom.com>
- References: <4eavq1$gat@pendragon.jsc.nasa.gov> <4eooc7$e3d@dub-news-svc-1.compuserve.com> <4eqsiq$7oj@cmcl2.NYU.EDU> <4ficta$6gu@soap.news.pipex.net>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: sac-ca5-09.ix.netcom.com
- Mime-Version: 1.0
- X-NETCOM-Date: Sat Feb 17 8:25:33 PM PST 1996
- X-Newsreader: WinVN 0.93.14
-
- In article <4ficta$6gu@soap.news.pipex.net>, p.howson@auntie.bbcnc.org.uk
- writes...
- >
- >
- >>This is true, but does anyone know what version of MFC BC5 will be able
- >to
- >>compile up to? Theoretically, it should be able to handle any version,
- >am I
- >>wrong? Will it be able to compile future versions? I'm just
- >wondering... I
- >>don't really know how the whole thing works :-)
- >>
- >>bye.
- >>chris.
- >MFC versions 3.2 and 4.0 according to Borlands Web Page
- >
-
- The ad I just recieved for it claims BC5.0 ships with a "compiler
- independant" patch of some form that must be applied to MFC (method
- undetailed) which the compiler needs. That doesn't really sound like it is
- compatable, But it is a nice try. (Go get 'em Borland)
-
- I am very curious about their STL support too. I will not be happy if it
- doesn't compile the Oct 95 release of the STL.
-
- I unfortunately must stick with Borland since I need what the Power Pack
- has to offer, otherwise I'd be using MSVC.
-
- my $0.02
-
-
- --
- But what's a revolution
- When the music plays
- And no one wants to dance. --T. Shaw & J. Blades
-
-